Technology governance and risk assessmentSAM registration: activeUEI WXMQSWKSVE44CAGE 20FG8

Federal programs & prime teams

Practical governance for technology and AI programs.

We help teams establish clear responsibilities, manage risks and prepare governance records for oversight reviews, including IG audits, ATO reviews and AI use-case reviews. We also assess existing governance and the records behind reported results. Our specialty is federal AI programs.

A defined piece of work. Clear deliverables. Senior principal-led delivery.

Defined scopeAgreed inputs, outputs and acceptance
Traceable findingsCriteria, records and stated limitations

What you buy

Find the work package that fits.

Scope, effort, price and acceptance criteria are agreed before work starts.

Establish

Put governance in place: responsibilities, risk handling and working procedures.

Responsibilities and approvals are not clear.

Governance setup

Define who makes decisions, which risks need review, when to escalate, and what records to keep.

You receive
A governance playbook, responsibility matrix, review checkpoints and working templates.
We need
Program objectives, existing policies, current processes and access to the responsible people.
Scope boundary
Governance advisory and working procedures, not software implementation.

Assess

Review existing governance, the records behind program claims and how controls operate over time.

An IG audit, ATO review or AI use-case review is approaching.

Readiness and evidence review

Review the agreed requirements and available records to identify what is covered, what is missing and what needs attention.

You receive
An evidence register, prioritized findings, an action list and a leadership readout.
We need
The decision to support, agreed review criteria, relevant records and approved access.
Scope boundary
Governance records and evidence only, not a complete ATO assessment, security testing or an authorization decision.

Leadership needs to know whether the reported numbers are reliable.

Performance-measure review

Examine definitions, source records, calculations and exclusions behind selected program measures.

You receive
Measure-by-measure findings, documented limitations and recommended corrections.
We need
Measure definitions, the reporting period, source records and calculation rules.
Scope boundary
A scoped measurement review, not a financial-statement audit or a guarantee of cost savings.

You need periodic checks that governance continues to operate.

Ongoing assurance

Review selected approvals, monitoring records, exceptions and corrective actions over an agreed period.

You receive
A periodic assurance report, exceptions register and corrective-action status summary.
We need
An established framework, selected controls, review periods and approved access to the relevant records.
Scope boundary
Scoped periodic reviews, not continuous monitoring of every event or full-system technical assurance.

For prime teams

A defined deliverable inside your program.

Bring a requirement or a delivery need. Together we define the work package, inputs, reporting arrangements, acceptance criteria and where our responsibility ends.

A clear workshare, agreed acceptance criteria and concise readouts keep the assignment connected to your delivery team and the program's decision schedule.

See how we scope and review work

Assessment basis

Published criteria. Traceable evidence. Defensible findings.

We agree the applicable criteria with the customer. Binding requirements are distinguished from voluntary frameworks and Elvaris's own assessment procedures.

NIST AI RMF 1.0Voluntary AI risk-management framework
NIST AI 600-1Generative AI risk profile and control considerations
OMB M-25-21Federal agency AI use and high-impact system requirements
OMB M-25-22Federal AI acquisition guidance
OMB M-26-04Increasing Public Trust in Artificial Intelligence Through Unbiased AI Principles
GAO AI FrameworkAccountability practices for AI systems
GPRA / GPRAMAPerformance measures, reliability, and evidence

Why Elvaris

Clear scope. Visible boundaries.

Governance advisory and independent assessment are different assignments. We do not independently assess governance or controls we designed or operated. For assessment work, we also agree access, reporting and conflict arrangements before making independence claims.

  1. 01Clear scope, deliverables and acceptance criteria
  2. 02Assessment against published criteria, not opinion
  3. 03Findings tied to sources, with limitations stated
  4. 04Senior practitioner delivery, engagement-scoped

Federal registration

Ready for acquisition review.

UEI
WXMQSWKSVE44
CAGE
20FG8
NAICS
541611 / 541512 / 541690
PSC
R408
SAM Registration
Active

About the practice

Senior experience. Focused assignments.

Elvaris is a small, principal-led consultancy in Rockville, Maryland. Founder Elio Rigillo brings about twenty years of program leadership, with experience in governance and risk assessment.

Our market focus is civilian federal technology programs, with DHS first and HHS second.

Methods & perspectives

See how we approach the work.

Read our assessment approach and clearly labeled illustrative examples. Method notes are not client case studies or certifications.

Start a conversation

What does your team need to get done?

Tell us about the program, the task and the decision or deadline approaching. We will discuss whether a bounded assignment fits. Please do not submit classified, controlled or confidential program records here.